Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mlyons
Fluke season or not, it was still a hell of a lot better than Scott Podsednik has ever even dreamed of being. Even his mediocre (according to you) 2004 season was better than Podsednik this year.
|
Podsednik had a .290 EQA a couple years ago; Roberts was at .306 this year. Roberts' mark is a lot better, but I think its something that Podsednik could dream of.
He is pretty much the sux now, however. It's amazing how much media attention he gets, a lot like Darin Erstad. So yeah, Roberts is substantially better than him overall.