|
Hmm I don't think I am taking sides I am simply arguing the fact that such statements (about who is best) can never be proven. It doesn't matter which side is trying to prove it or what information they have.
Are you going to tell me you can prove who the best player is? Or what the best city in the world to live in is? Or who the most beautiful person is? These are all similar statements to what you are saying and I think even you would agree you could never prove any reply.
Since none of these things can ever be proven he is "innocent" in his statement. Since you can not prove him "guilty beyond a shadow of a doubt" why does he need to present a case?
If I said hockey is the best sport and gave a whole whack of arguements and statistics could I still ever prove such a statement? No.
So simply by disagreeing with me would you then not be correct?
The answer is yes and that is why Cooleyvol does not need to backup his statement, sorry.
|