Quote:
|
Originally Posted by knockahoma
Hi,
This is actually my 2nd post. I bought OOTP 4 and saw a similar thread.
Recently, I just purchased 6. So, I thought I'd pass the thought along again.
Whether or not statistics seem to support catcher-pitcher chemistry, or the "smart defensive, pitch-calling catcher's" value, historically MANAGERS have believed in such catching qualities-- and created lineups with them in mind.
I DO think the AI should take that into consideration, especially as playing historical replays is a big part of OOTP. Those managers in the 40s, 50s and 60's believed in the theory of the "smart" catcher. It kept average armed and the athletically mediocre in the league for years. In OOTP, without this consideration placed in the minds of AI managers, Duffy Dyers don't last as long as they did in real life.
Considering there is no statistical evidence, no change has to be made to the engine for increasing performances of the pitchers-- but a simple programming asterisk could recognize these catchers as 'purportedly' valuable in these areas. Meanwhile, these types of catchers stick around and get into the lineup.
|
Watch it now...I got into a big pissing match with others about this very thing...lol
But you are correct, historically, C and SS were more defense orientated...and Catcher's had a variety of attributes besides offense that made them stand out...
Schalk and his amazing defense, and knowing batter tendecies
Jimmy Archer and his iron molded gun for an arm
Roger Bresnahan and his loud obnoxious berating of batters
The best option I feel, is to have it in the era settings, much like the leadoff AI...where you can choose whether offense, defense or neutral is more valued at a given position.