[nmleague]

I don't want to give the wrong impression, I have voted for other peoples logos in each week of the competition. Actually I think the multiple choice vote is the best, for each competition there have been a number of outstanding logos but one or two that outshine the rest, unforuntately with the one vote system a number of logos that are decent get no votes. My objection from the first has been that Cuss along with some others have done logos with text or detail so small that it cannot be read or seen in the game. Since this was started as a competition for OOTP logos it would stand to reason that a major criteria would be that the logos actually should work well in the game. I don't care how excellant a logo is, and there is no doubt that the Logos done by Cuss are usually the best artistically, they should not recieve votes if they don't work in the game. That is why I stated it seems that many have a great admiration, well deserved, for Cuss's logos, and vote for them even though they don't compare well with many other when viewed in the game. With the limited 150 x 150 space the designers face a real problem. If you want to have the team city and name in text large enough to read in the game you have to difinite space restrictions for the rest of the logo. Its much different to do a logo when you are paying attention to that restraint.